Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

Amazon is offering the SiriusXM Roady BT In-Vehicle Satellite Radio Kit for $69.99 shipped. Down 30% from its normal going rate at Amazon, today’s deal marks a new low that we’ve tracked there and is also the first discount all-time at the retailer. Designed to deliver in-vehicle entertainment, the Roady BT satellite radio installs in your car and connects to your stereo through Bluetooth, 3.5mm aux, or over a built-in FM transmitter. You can choose to mount it via a magnetic vent or dash adapter and there’s an additional mounting system that’s sold separately should you need it. Plus, it comes with a three month free trial of Sirius XM or you could opt for 12 months of the brand’s Platinum Programming Package for $99. Keep reading for more.

more…

The post SiriusXM Roady BT in-car satellite radio kit lets you tune in anywhere for $70 (First sale) appeared first on 9to5Toys.

Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

14.9 C
New York
[tds_menu_login guest_tdicon="td-icon-profile" logout_tdicon="td-icon-log-out" tdc_css="eyJhbGwiOnsibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbSI6IjAiLCJkaXNwbGF5IjoiIn19" toggle_txt_color="var(--news-hub-white)" menu_offset_top="eyJhbGwiOiIxOSIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE3IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxNSJ9" menu_offset_horiz="eyJhbGwiOi02LCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiItMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiLTIifQ==" menu_horiz_align="content-horiz-right" menu_bg="var(--news-hub-black)" menu_uh_color="var(--news-hub-light-grey)" menu_uh_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" menu_ul_link_color="#ffffff" menu_ul_link_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_ul_sep_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" menu_uf_txt_color="var(--news-hub-white)" menu_uf_txt_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_uf_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" f_uh_font_family="325" f_uh_font_line_height="1.3" f_links_font_family="325" f_links_font_line_height="1.3" f_uf_font_line_height="1.3" f_uf_font_family="325" menu_uh_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIyMHB4IDI1cHggMThweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE1cHggMjBweCAxM3B4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMHB4IDE1cHggOHB4In0=" menu_ul_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHgiLCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxNnB4IDIwcHgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjhweCAxNXB4In0=" menu_ul_space="eyJhbGwiOiIxMCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjYifQ==" menu_ulo_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHggMjBweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzcHggMjBweCAxNXB4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiI4cHggMTVweCAxMHB4In0=" menu_shadow_shadow_size="0" menu_arrow_color="rgba(255,255,255,0)" menu_width="eyJhbGwiOiIyMjAiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjE4MCJ9" show_version="" menu_gh_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIyMHB4IDI1cHggMThweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE1cHggMjBweCAxM3B4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMHB4IDE1cHggOHB4In0=" menu_gc_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHggMjBweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzcHggMjBweCAxNXB4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiI4cHggMTVweCAxMHB4In0=" menu_gh_color="var(--news-hub-light-grey)" menu_gh_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" f_gh_font_family="325" menu_gc_btn1_bg_color="var(--news-hub-accent)" menu_gc_btn1_bg_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_gc_btn2_color="var(--news-hub-accent)" menu_gc_btn2_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" f_btn1_font_family="325" f_btn1_font_transform="uppercase" f_btn2_font_family="325" f_btn2_font_transform="uppercase" f_btn1_font_weight="700" f_btn2_font_weight="700" show_menu="yes" f_uf_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMiIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" icon_color="var(--news-hub-white)" icon_size="eyJhbGwiOjIyLCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIyMCIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTgifQ==" avatar_size="eyJhbGwiOiIyMiIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjIwIiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxOCJ9" ia_space="eyJhbGwiOiIxMCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjYifQ==" f_toggle_font_family="325" f_toggle_font_size="eyJhbGwiOiIxNCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzIiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMiJ9" logout_size="eyJhbGwiOjE0LCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyJ9" f_uh_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" f_links_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" f_gh_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ=="]

Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockholders than on R&D

Published:

Big Pharma spends billions more on executives and stockholders than on R&D

Enlarge (credit: Senate HELP Committee)

When big pharmaceutical companies are confronted over their exorbitant pricing of prescription drugs in the US, they often retreat to two well-worn arguments: One, that the high drug prices cover costs of researching and developing new drugs, a risky and expensive endeavor, and two, that middle managers—pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), to be specific—are actually the ones price gouging Americans.

Both of these arguments faced substantial blows in a hearing Thursday held by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, chaired by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). In fact, pharmaceutical companies are spending billions of dollars more on lavish executive compensation, dividends, and stock buyouts than they spend on research and development (R&D) for new drugs, Sanders pointed out. "In other words, these companies are spending more to enrich their own stockholders and CEOs than they are in finding new cures and new treatments," he said.

And, while PBMs certainly contribute to America's uniquely astronomical drug pricing, their profiteering accounts for a small fraction of the massive drug market, Sanders and an expert panelist noted. PBMs work as shadowy middle managers between drugmakers, insurers, and pharmacies, setting drug formularies and consumer prices, and negotiating rebates and discounts behind the scenes. Though PBMs practices contribute to overall costs, they pale compared to pharmaceutical profits.

Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img