Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

Amazon is offering the SiriusXM Roady BT In-Vehicle Satellite Radio Kit for $69.99 shipped. Down 30% from its normal going rate at Amazon, today’s deal marks a new low that we’ve tracked there and is also the first discount all-time at the retailer. Designed to deliver in-vehicle entertainment, the Roady BT satellite radio installs in your car and connects to your stereo through Bluetooth, 3.5mm aux, or over a built-in FM transmitter. You can choose to mount it via a magnetic vent or dash adapter and there’s an additional mounting system that’s sold separately should you need it. Plus, it comes with a three month free trial of Sirius XM or you could opt for 12 months of the brand’s Platinum Programming Package for $99. Keep reading for more.

more…

The post SiriusXM Roady BT in-car satellite radio kit lets you tune in anywhere for $70 (First sale) appeared first on 9to5Toys.

Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

13.5 C
New York
[tds_menu_login guest_tdicon="td-icon-profile" logout_tdicon="td-icon-log-out" tdc_css="eyJhbGwiOnsibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbSI6IjAiLCJkaXNwbGF5IjoiIn19" toggle_txt_color="var(--news-hub-white)" menu_offset_top="eyJhbGwiOiIxOSIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE3IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxNSJ9" menu_offset_horiz="eyJhbGwiOi02LCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiItMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiLTIifQ==" menu_horiz_align="content-horiz-right" menu_bg="var(--news-hub-black)" menu_uh_color="var(--news-hub-light-grey)" menu_uh_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" menu_ul_link_color="#ffffff" menu_ul_link_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_ul_sep_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" menu_uf_txt_color="var(--news-hub-white)" menu_uf_txt_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_uf_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" f_uh_font_family="325" f_uh_font_line_height="1.3" f_links_font_family="325" f_links_font_line_height="1.3" f_uf_font_line_height="1.3" f_uf_font_family="325" menu_uh_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIyMHB4IDI1cHggMThweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE1cHggMjBweCAxM3B4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMHB4IDE1cHggOHB4In0=" menu_ul_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHgiLCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxNnB4IDIwcHgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjhweCAxNXB4In0=" menu_ul_space="eyJhbGwiOiIxMCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjYifQ==" menu_ulo_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHggMjBweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzcHggMjBweCAxNXB4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiI4cHggMTVweCAxMHB4In0=" menu_shadow_shadow_size="0" menu_arrow_color="rgba(255,255,255,0)" menu_width="eyJhbGwiOiIyMjAiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjE4MCJ9" show_version="" menu_gh_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIyMHB4IDI1cHggMThweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE1cHggMjBweCAxM3B4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMHB4IDE1cHggOHB4In0=" menu_gc_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHggMjBweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzcHggMjBweCAxNXB4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiI4cHggMTVweCAxMHB4In0=" menu_gh_color="var(--news-hub-light-grey)" menu_gh_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" f_gh_font_family="325" menu_gc_btn1_bg_color="var(--news-hub-accent)" menu_gc_btn1_bg_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_gc_btn2_color="var(--news-hub-accent)" menu_gc_btn2_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" f_btn1_font_family="325" f_btn1_font_transform="uppercase" f_btn2_font_family="325" f_btn2_font_transform="uppercase" f_btn1_font_weight="700" f_btn2_font_weight="700" show_menu="yes" f_uf_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMiIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" icon_color="var(--news-hub-white)" icon_size="eyJhbGwiOjIyLCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIyMCIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTgifQ==" avatar_size="eyJhbGwiOiIyMiIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjIwIiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxOCJ9" ia_space="eyJhbGwiOiIxMCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjYifQ==" f_toggle_font_family="325" f_toggle_font_size="eyJhbGwiOiIxNCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzIiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMiJ9" logout_size="eyJhbGwiOjE0LCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyJ9" f_uh_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" f_links_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" f_gh_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ=="]

Motherboard makers apparently to blame for high-end Intel Core i9 CPU failures

Published:

Intel's top-end i9-14900KS.

Enlarge / Intel's top-end i9-14900KS. (credit: Intel)

Earlier this month, we wrote that some of Intel's recent high-end Core i9 and Core i7 processors had been crashing and exhibiting other weird issues in some games and that Intel was investigating the cause.

An Intel statement obtained by Igor's Lab suggests that Intel's investigation is wrapping up, and the company is pointing squarely in the direction of enthusiast motherboard makers that are turning up power limits and disabling safeguards to try to wring a little more performance out of the processors.

"While the root cause has not yet been identified, Intel has observed the majority of reports of this issue are from users with unlocked/overclock capable motherboards," the statement reads. "Intel has observed 600/700 Series chipset boards often set BIOS defaults to disable thermal and power delivery safeguards designed to limit processor exposure to sustained periods of high voltage and frequency."

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img