Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

Amazon is offering the SiriusXM Roady BT In-Vehicle Satellite Radio Kit for $69.99 shipped. Down 30% from its normal going rate at Amazon, today’s deal marks a new low that we’ve tracked there and is also the first discount all-time at the retailer. Designed to deliver in-vehicle entertainment, the Roady BT satellite radio installs in your car and connects to your stereo through Bluetooth, 3.5mm aux, or over a built-in FM transmitter. You can choose to mount it via a magnetic vent or dash adapter and there’s an additional mounting system that’s sold separately should you need it. Plus, it comes with a three month free trial of Sirius XM or you could opt for 12 months of the brand’s Platinum Programming Package for $99. Keep reading for more.

more…

The post SiriusXM Roady BT in-car satellite radio kit lets you tune in anywhere for $70 (First sale) appeared first on 9to5Toys.

Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

20.1 C
New York
[tds_menu_login guest_tdicon="td-icon-profile" logout_tdicon="td-icon-log-out" tdc_css="eyJhbGwiOnsibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbSI6IjAiLCJkaXNwbGF5IjoiIn19" toggle_txt_color="var(--news-hub-white)" menu_offset_top="eyJhbGwiOiIxOSIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE3IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxNSJ9" menu_offset_horiz="eyJhbGwiOi02LCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiItMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiLTIifQ==" menu_horiz_align="content-horiz-right" menu_bg="var(--news-hub-black)" menu_uh_color="var(--news-hub-light-grey)" menu_uh_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" menu_ul_link_color="#ffffff" menu_ul_link_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_ul_sep_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" menu_uf_txt_color="var(--news-hub-white)" menu_uf_txt_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_uf_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" f_uh_font_family="325" f_uh_font_line_height="1.3" f_links_font_family="325" f_links_font_line_height="1.3" f_uf_font_line_height="1.3" f_uf_font_family="325" menu_uh_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIyMHB4IDI1cHggMThweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE1cHggMjBweCAxM3B4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMHB4IDE1cHggOHB4In0=" menu_ul_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHgiLCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxNnB4IDIwcHgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjhweCAxNXB4In0=" menu_ul_space="eyJhbGwiOiIxMCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjYifQ==" menu_ulo_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHggMjBweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzcHggMjBweCAxNXB4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiI4cHggMTVweCAxMHB4In0=" menu_shadow_shadow_size="0" menu_arrow_color="rgba(255,255,255,0)" menu_width="eyJhbGwiOiIyMjAiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjE4MCJ9" show_version="" menu_gh_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIyMHB4IDI1cHggMThweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjE1cHggMjBweCAxM3B4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMHB4IDE1cHggOHB4In0=" menu_gc_padd="eyJhbGwiOiIxOHB4IDI1cHggMjBweCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzcHggMjBweCAxNXB4IiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiI4cHggMTVweCAxMHB4In0=" menu_gh_color="var(--news-hub-light-grey)" menu_gh_border_color="var(--news-hub-dark-grey)" f_gh_font_family="325" menu_gc_btn1_bg_color="var(--news-hub-accent)" menu_gc_btn1_bg_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" menu_gc_btn2_color="var(--news-hub-accent)" menu_gc_btn2_color_h="var(--news-hub-accent-hover)" f_btn1_font_family="325" f_btn1_font_transform="uppercase" f_btn2_font_family="325" f_btn2_font_transform="uppercase" f_btn1_font_weight="700" f_btn2_font_weight="700" show_menu="yes" f_uf_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMiIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" icon_color="var(--news-hub-white)" icon_size="eyJhbGwiOjIyLCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIyMCIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTgifQ==" avatar_size="eyJhbGwiOiIyMiIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjIwIiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxOCJ9" ia_space="eyJhbGwiOiIxMCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjgiLCJwb3J0cmFpdCI6IjYifQ==" f_toggle_font_family="325" f_toggle_font_size="eyJhbGwiOiIxNCIsImxhbmRzY2FwZSI6IjEzIiwicG9ydHJhaXQiOiIxMiJ9" logout_size="eyJhbGwiOjE0LCJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyJ9" f_uh_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" f_links_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ==" f_gh_font_size="eyJsYW5kc2NhcGUiOiIxMyIsInBvcnRyYWl0IjoiMTIifQ=="]

Google’s AI Overview is flawed by design, and a new company blog post hints at why

Published:

A selection of Google mascot characters created by the company.

Enlarge / The Google "G" logo surrounded by whimsical characters, all of which look stunned and surprised. (credit: Google)

On Thursday, Google capped off a rough week of providing inaccurate and sometimes dangerous answers through its experimental AI Overview feature by authoring a follow-up blog post titled, "AI Overviews: About last week." In the post, attributed to Google VP Liz Reid, head of Google Search, the firm formally acknowledged issues with the feature and outlined steps taken to improve a system that appears flawed by design, even if it doesn't realize it is admitting it.

To recap, the AI Overview feature—which the company showed off at Google I/O a few weeks ago—aims to provide search users with summarized answers to questions by using an AI model integrated with Google's web ranking systems. Right now, it's an experimental feature that is not active for everyone, but when a participating user searches for a topic, they might see an AI-generated answer at the top of the results, pulled from highly ranked web content and summarized by an AI model.

While Google claims this approach is "highly effective" and on par with its Featured Snippets in terms of accuracy, the past week has seen numerous examples of the AI system generating bizarre, incorrect, or even potentially harmful responses, as we detailed in a recent feature where Ars reporter Kyle Orland replicated many of the unusual outputs.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ars Technica - All contentContinue reading/original-link]

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img